{"id":569064,"date":"2017-12-01T16:11:22","date_gmt":"2017-12-01T21:11:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.snkrsday.com\/?p=569064"},"modified":"2017-12-01T16:46:40","modified_gmt":"2017-12-01T21:46:40","slug":"nike-vs-adidas-lawsuit-knit-sneaker-continues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.snkrsday.com\/nike-vs-adidas-lawsuit-knit-sneaker-continues\/","title":{"rendered":"Nike vs. Adidas Lawsuit Over Knit Sneaker Continues"},"content":{"rendered":"
Back in 2012, Nike introduced Flyknit<\/strong> — an innovation that would dramatically change the aesthetic value of their footwear as well as the way it was produced. Shortly after, as in months after and also in 2012, adidas would unveil Primeknit<\/strong> — a nearly identical innovation that would also have added value to their brand in footwear in regards to aesthetics, performance and manufacturing.<\/p>\n To no surprise, Nike filed a temporary injunction that would halt adidas from not only selling Primeknit shoes, but also making them, claiming it was a copy of Flyknit.<\/p>\n To some surprise, Nike filed the original patent for Flyknit in 2004.<\/em> Translation? When Nike was putting out LeBron’s rookie season shoe, the Air Zoom Generation, they were already readying the world for the LeBron 15.<\/p>\n *Explosion*<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n As the tale of the tape — or thread — would have it, Nike would have major success in 2012 with the likes of the Flyknit Racer and Flyknit Trainer. While all this was going on, adidas would essentially have to wait despite being a few months late to the party.<\/p>\n Why? In September of 2012, the District Court in Nuremberg, Germany would grant Nike’s application for interim injunction for patent infringement by adidas on the Primeknit sneaker. Due to said injunction, adidas was ordered to stop the manufacturing and distribution of Primeknit in Germany, where the brand is based.<\/p>\n In 2013, Flyknit flourished on models like the Lunar Chukka and has ever since, with the tech\u00a0amassing “over $1 billion in sales” since its introduction in 2012, all the way up until time of publish as Portland Business Journal<\/a> — the original source of this story — tells it.<\/p>\n All the while, back in 2012 and 2013, Primeknit continued to have trouble finding its footing. For the majority of 2013 and 2014, Primeknit technology was mostly visible and mostly available only outside of the US, with overseas drops at UK retailers resulting in stateside press. Primeknit models would see US availability and visibility most notably nearly two years after its 2012 unveiling, with the December 2014 drop of the adidas adiZero Primeknit Boost LTD.<\/p>\n The initial read on Primeknit by the mainstream was that it was a bite on Flyknit — possible in regards to aesthetic and manufacturing, but also improbable in regards to how long it takes to develop and turn out a product. (You’d have to be a true Big Baller to turn out a shoe or tech within months of seeing another brand do it.) The lawsuit hurt sales, due to lack of availability in Nike’s homeland of the US, but also perhaps created intrigue around it just the same.<\/p>\n Buzz or barricade, this would all culminate with perfect timing in 2015, as adidas would release the very pivotal Ultra Boost. While the model would be championed early on as a performance running shoe, it would catch fire in the lifestyle space thanks to consistent wearings from Kanye West. It should be noted that while previously under contract with the Swoosh in 2012, Kanye’s surprise wear of the Flyknit Trainer with jeans — far from a track or treadmill — had the same effect on sales and interest for Flyknit, as far as the sneaker culture and resale market are concerned.<\/p>\n