{"id":162392,"date":"2011-05-15T15:58:33","date_gmt":"2011-05-15T20:58:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nicekicks.com\/?p=162392"},"modified":"2022-09-16T01:46:16","modified_gmt":"2022-09-16T06:46:16","slug":"good-bad-ugly-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.snkrsday.com\/good-bad-ugly-5\/","title":{"rendered":"The Good, the Bad & the Ugly"},"content":{"rendered":"
This week saw two Air Jordan samples that could be deemed good, bad, or ugly. That?s all fine and dandy, but neither of the two makes the slots this week. Retro and performance sneakers both show up in the good, the bad, and the ugly. From a double postponing to our own iD blunder, a variety of sneaker news is covered. What were your picks? Tell us in the comment section.<\/p>\n
THE GOOD- NIKE AIR GRIFFEY MAX 1 “EMERALD”<\/strong><\/p>\n Nike Air Griffey Max 1 “Emerald”<\/p>\n Three years in counting, the Griffey Max 1 retro run continues. This OG colorway will have everyone returning to Emerald City.<\/p>\n Air Jordan 2011 Postponed (Again)<\/p>\n Sneakerheads live release-to-release and sometimes check-to-check. Postponing a release (twice) is no good for the scheduled copper, especially with all the heat releasing this year.<\/p>\n Jordan Fly Wade on NikeiD<\/p>\n We really like the Fly Wade in the office, but this playground inspired iD mockup had the comment section rolling. Make a better pair then this at NikeiD<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This week saw two Air Jordan samples that could be deemed good, bad, or ugly. That?s all fine and dandy,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2415,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1225672],"cultivate_rss":[],"class_list":{"2":"type-post"},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\nTHE BAD- AIR JORDAN 2011 POSTPONED (AGAIN)<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nOUR MOCKUP OF THE JORDAN FLY WADE iD<\/strong><\/p>\n