The Nike Hyperdunk revolutionized basketball footwear in 2008 to say the least. Its extremely lightweight silhouette became the first basketball sneaker to possess two of Nike’s latest technologies: Flywire and Lunar Foam. Although it ultimately became an instant classic, the Nike Hyperdunk possessed its fair share of weaknesses as well.<\/p>\n
The newly-designed Nike Hyperdunk 2010 obviously thrives in the some of the areas where its predecessor lacks (see our Performance Review: Nike Hyperdunk 2010). However, does this undoubtedly crown the Nike Hyperdunk 2010 as the better sneaker of the two? Check out our Nike Hyperdunk vs Nike Hyperdunk 2010 Comparison below to see the similarities and differences between the two player-friendly sneakers.<\/p>\n
**Note** <\/strong>Voice your opinion by choosing your favorite of the two through our voting poll at the bottom of the last page.<\/p>\n Zoom Air Technology vs Lunar Foam<\/em><\/p>\n One will notice a complete difference when placing your foot in either one of these shoes. The Nike Hyperdunk positions Lunar Foam under the sole causing the foot to feel as if its on top of a very flat surface. There is little-to-no elevation of one’s foot which decreases the comfort level. As for the Nike Hyperdunk 2010, Zoom Air technology is undoubtedly an upgrade. The full-foot cushioning system is ultra-responsive and provides your foot with an unmatched level of comfort and stability.<\/p>\n Edge<\/strong>: Nike Hyperdunk 2010<\/em><\/p>\n Flat Shoelaces vs Athletic Round Shoelaces<\/em><\/p>\n The lacing structure on both sneakers serves much more of a purpose that a complimentary design; it seems to effect the lockdown support trait of each sneaker. The Nike Hyperdunk possesses a very flexible, elastic-like lacing structure, and it allows one to firmly grip its athletic round laces. With that said, your foot feels very secure in the confines of the inner sleeve when laced properly. On the contrary, the flat shoelaces seen on the Nike Hyperdunk 2010 are not as easy to corral when securing the foot. We also noticed minimal indents and flexes in certain areas (toe & side panels) when lacing this sneaker up.<\/p>\n Edge<\/strong>: Nike Hyperdunk<\/em> Synthetic Skinwire vs Leather\/Nubuck <\/em><\/p>\n Durability is a key characteristic for any basketball sneaker these days. No one wants a sneaker that will only last half a season. With that said, the Nike Hyperdunk is a rather durable sneaker as it possesses battle-tested textures including leather and nubuck. The Nike Hyperdunk 2010 owns a newly-developed synthetic Skinwire texture which doesn’t seems as sturdy. It almost seems as if the new material is similar to a plastic substance. The Nike Hyperdunk contains leather\/nubuck in sections where the most stress occurs (toe & section between the toe and side panel), whereas the Hyperdunk 2010 uses the synthetic material, along with Flywire technology in the same places.<\/p>\n Edge<\/strong>: Nike Hyperdunk<\/em><\/p>\n Herringbone Traction<\/em><\/p>\n Traction is one of the Nike Hyperdunk’s biggest weaknesses according to many wearers. Its indented, recessed herringbone pattern easily picks up dust and other particles which ultimately produce a sleek surface. The updated Nike Hyperdunk 2010’s outsole features many more contrasting indents and acts as a cleat-like traction bed against the hardwood.<\/p>\n Edge<\/strong>: Nike Hyperdunk 2010<\/em><\/p>\n TPU Heel Cup vs Lunar Heel Cup<\/em><\/p>\n Much like the aforementioned sole differential, the heel unit characteristic plays a big part in comfort level and cushioning. The Hyperdunk 2010 uses a TPU heel unit which provides a high amount of durability, stability and support. The Hyperdunk’s heel unit is comprised of Lunar Foam, which, as stated earlier, has received a vast amount criticism for its lack durability.<\/p>\n Edge<\/strong>: Nike Hyperdunk 2010<\/em>Sole Construction<\/h3>\n
Lacing Structure<\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nTexture Makeup<\/h3>\n
Traction<\/h3>\n
Heel Unit<\/h3>\n
\n<\/p>\nDetailed Photos<\/h3>\n